ReSPA | Yearly Questionnaire Policy Planning, Better Regulation and Coordination of Center of Government Thematic Area

0

INTRODUCTORY QUESTIONS

0.1 Which administration do you represent?

0.2 In which institution do you operate?
Please insert in the comment box below

0.3 Which of the following activities have you participated in?
Select the events from the list below

ReSPA Academy on Evidence-based Policy-making Processes “Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Policies” , 05-08 June 2023, Bar (Montenegro);

Working visit of the ReSPA delegation to the Government of Slovenia, 25 - 27 September 2023, Ljubljana (Slovenia);

Regional Conference on Challenges of Achieving Effective Policy Planning in the Western Balkans, 19 – 20 October 2023, Vienna (Austria);

Consultative Meeting on ReSPA Activities in the Area of Better Regulation, 18 October 2023, Vienna (Austria);

Executive Training Programme and Certificate in Economics for Policy-makers, organised by the European University Institute, 02 November 2023, Florence (Italy).

Western Balkans High-Level Policy Dialogue “Attractive and Skilled Public Service Fit for Future”,17 November 2023, Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina);

31st NISPACee Annual Conference “Future of Public Administration through Emerging Technologies”, May 2023;

Workshop on Leading with Vision: Cultivating Foresightful Leadership, 20 – 21 November 2023, Paris (France).

1

INDIVIDUAL IMPROVEMENTS

1.1.1. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have enhanced the exchange of know-how and communication between you and your colleagues? (This question does not regard the improvement of your institution but your personal improvement which you can use in your institution or elsewhere. The institutional change is addressed in questions 1.2.1 and 1.2.2)

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

They improved my cooperation with colleagues and provided for a better working environment within my institution (please give examples)

They helped me engage in more informed dialogue with superiors/subordinates within my institution. (please give examples)

They improved my cooperation with colleagues from other institutions from my own administration, from the region, or the EU. (please give examples)

They helped me enhance my career prospects (e.g. promotion, new, better or higher position). (please give examples)

They led to other improvements in personal experience and work methods. (please give examples)

1.1.2. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have contributed to acquiring knowledge and enhancing skills in the area of policy planning, better regulation and coordination for the Center for Government. (This question does not regard the improvement of your institution but your personal improvement which you can use in your institution or elsewhere. The institutional change is addressed in questions 1.2.1 and 1.2.2)

Please, tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding short explanation(s).

They improved my involvement in the preparation/implementation/monitoring of a strategy and/or a regulatory/legal framework. (please give examples)

They improved my involvement in the preparation/implementation /monitoring/costing of an action plan. (please give examples)

They supported my involvement in the promotion/establishment/consolidation of inter-ministerial (inter-institutional) coordination mechanism. (please give examples)

I gained know-how in specific planning and policy analysis techniques and methods. (please give examples)

They improved my involvement in public consultation or national/local RIA. (please give examples)

They supported me in advancing my other personal functions and skills. (please give examples)

2

INSTITUTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

1.2.1. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have contributed to the progress of your institution in improving working methods, coordination and networking?

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please, provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

Coordination and exchange of information within the institution and with other institutions is improved. (please give examples)

Best practices are discussed and analysed with a view to their possible application. (please give examples)

Specific conclusions from activities that have been adopted/implemented. (please give examples)

Other changes in the institutional methods of work. (please give examples)

1.2.2. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities contributed to institutional achievements and strengthened institutional functions in the area of policy planning, better regulation, and coordination of the Center of Government?

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

Information systems have been established/improved. (please give examples)

Progress has been made to improve strategic documents, laws or regulations. (please give examples)

New tools have been tested/adopted. (please give examples)

New functions/offices and capacities for policy development, inter-ministerial and inter-institutional coordination have been created and/or organised. (please give examples)

The institution is engaged in the design/preparation/implementation of RIA consultations and reporting. (please give examples)

Other changes in the institutional functions and capacities took place. (please give examples)

3

LINK WITH PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM (PAR) IMPLEMENTATION

1.3. Has the institutional improvement in the responses mentioned above contributed to forwarding the PAR implementation in your administration in the area of Policy Planning, Better Regulation, and Coordination of the Center of Government, in the period covered by monitoring?

Please choose one of the options below.

Yes

No

Please describe briefly/give examples:

Please provide some references for your statements above, according to the following list (tick as many boxes as appropriate and specify the name and date of the specific report)

ReSPA research documents (Please specify the name)

Internal monitoring documents (Please specify the name)

EC Reports on specific administrations (Please specify the name)

SIGMA monitoring reports and reviews (Please specify the name)

Specific assessments (Please specify the name)

Political endorsement at a ReSPA High-Level Policy Dialogue meeting (Please specify the name)

WeBER Monitoring Report (Please specify the name)

Other (Please specify the name)

4

PROPOSALS AND IDEAS FOR NEW ACTIVITIES

4.1. Please share with us some potential topics for future ReSPA activities within the Policy Planning, Better Regulation, and Coordination of Center of Government thematic area:

Regional School of Public Administration

Yearly Questionnaire
Policy Planning, Better Regulation and Coordination of Center of Government Thematic Area

THEMATIC AREA 1: POLICY PLANNING, BETTER REGULATION AND COORDINATION OF CENTER FOR GOVERNMENT

We use cookies on our website to support technical features that enhance your user experience. We also use analytics.