ReSPA | Yearly Questionnaire Policy Planning, Better Regulation and Coordination of Center of Government Thematic Area

0

INTRODUCTORY QUESTIONS

0.1 Which administration do you represent?

0.2 In which institution do you operate?
Please insert in the comment box below

0.3 Which of the following activities have you participated in?
Select the events from the list below

Thematic activities

Programme committee meeting (Skopje, January 2024)

3rd Module of the Regional Academy on evidence-based policymaking (Mostar, April 2024)

Regional Thematic Group for Policy Development and Coordination/ Better Regulation study visit to the Ludovika University of Public Service (Budapest, April 2024)

2nd module of the "Connecting Western Balkans with the Italian Administration Programme" (Caserta and Rome, May 2024)

Summer School on "EU Better Regulation and EU Integration (Tirana, June 2024)

The Fourth module of the Regional Academy on Evidence-Informed Policymaking, "Policy Making in a Digital World (Ohrid, September 2024)

Regional Conference on Parliaments and Evidence-Based Lawmaking in the Western Balkans (Rome, October 2024)

Training Programme for Strengthening Civil Society in Public Administration Reform (Skopje, October 2024)

Conference "Exploring Dimensions of Public Management, Policy, and Administration Across Diverse Sectors (Tetovo, October 2024)

Mobility Visit of the Ministry of Information Society and Administration of North Macedonia to the Italian Department for Public Administration

Mobility Visit of the Serbian Public Policy Secretariat (PPS) to Austria

Mobility Visit of the representatives of the Regulatory Impact Assessment relevant institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina to Slovenia

Mobility Visit of the representatives of the Regulatory Impact Assessment relevant institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina in Croatia

Mobility Visit of the Representatives of the Albanian RIA Oversight Unit (PM Office) to the RIA Unit of the Government of the Czech Republic

The Montenegro Ministry of Finance collaborated with counterparts from the Croatian Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development to explore the implementation of a dynamic Public-Private Partnership

Horisontal activities

2024 High-Level Policy Dialogue in the Western Balkans (Skopje, November 2024)

1

INDIVIDUAL IMPROVEMENTS

1.1.1. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have enhanced the exchange of know-how and communication between you and your colleagues?? (This question does not regard the improvement of your institution but your personal improvement which you can use in your institution or elsewhere. The institutional change is addressed in questions 1.2.1 and 1.2.2)

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

They improved my cooperation with colleagues and provided for a better working environment within my institution. (please give examples)

They helped me engage in more informed dialogue with superiors/subordinates within my institution. (please give examples)

They improved my cooperation with colleagues from other institutions from my own administration, from the region, or the EU. (please give examples)

They helped me enhance my career prospects (e.g. promotion, new, better or higher position). (please give examples)

They led to other improvements in personal experience and work methods. (please give examples)

1.1.2. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have contributed to acquiring knowledge and enhancing skills in the area of policy planning, better regulation and coordination for the Center for Government? (This question does not regard the improvement of your institution but your personal improvement which you can use in your institution or elsewhere. The institutional change is addressed in questions 1.2.1 and 1.2.2)

Please, tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding short explanation(s).

They improved my involvement in the preparation/implementation/monitoring of a strategy and/or a regulatory/legal framework. (please give examples)

They improved my involvement in the preparation/implementation /monitoring/costing of an action plan. (please give examples)

They supported my involvement in the promotion/establishment/consolidation of inter-ministerial (inter-institutional) coordination mechanism. (please give examples)

I gained know-how in specific planning and policy analysis techniques and methods. (please give examples)

They improved my involvement in public consultation or national/local RIA. (please give examples)

They supported me in advancing my other personal functions and skills. (please give examples)

2

INSTITUTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

1.2.1. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have contributed to the progress of your institution in improving working methods, coordination and networking?

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please, provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

Coordination and exchange of information within the institution and with other institutions is improved. (please give examples)

Best practices are discussed and analysed with a view to their possible application. (please give examples)

Specific conclusions/recommendations from activities that have been adopted/implemented. (please give examples)

Other changes in the institutional methods of work. (please give examples)

1.2.2. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities contributed to institutional achievements and strengthened institutional functions in the area of policy planning, better regulation, and coordination of the Center of Government?

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

Information systems have been established/improved. (please give examples)

Progress has been made to improve strategic documents, laws or regulations. (please give examples)

New tools have been tested/adopted. (please give examples)

New functions/offices and capacities for policy development, inter-ministerial and inter-institutional coordination have been created and/or organised. (please give examples)

The institution is engaged in the design/preparation/implementation of RIA consultations and reporting. (please give examples)

Other changes in the institutional functions and capacities took place. (please give examples)

3

LINK WITH PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM (PAR) IMPLEMENTATION

1.3. Has the institutional improvement in the responses mentioned above contributed to the PAR implementation in your administration, in the period covered by monitoring?

Please choose one of the options below.

Yes

No

Please describe briefly/give examples:

4

PROPOSALS AND IDEAS FOR NEW ACTIVITIES

Please share with us some potential topics for future ReSPA activities within the Policy Planning, Better Regulation, and Coordination of Center of Government thematic area:

Regional School of Public Administration

Yearly Questionnaire
Policy Planning, Better Regulation and Coordination of Center of Government Thematic Area

THEMATIC AREA 1: POLICY PLANNING, BETTER REGULATION AND COORDINATION OF CENTER FOR GOVERNMENT

We use cookies on our website to support technical features that enhance your user experience. We also use analytics.